R. v. D.M.
Client was charged with sexually assaulting his wife. It was alleged that he had assaulted her and after being released on bail, returned to her home and sexually assaulted her. He was charged with Sexual Assault, Assault, Criminal Harassment, Failing to Comply with his Recognizance and several other offences.
Result: Found “not guilty” of all charges after trial.
R. v. H.H.
Client charged with Sexual Assault. It was alleged that he forced another woman who lived in the same apartment building with him, to have sexual intercourse. He denied this allegation and gave a motive for this woman to fabricate the story.
Result: Found “not guilty” by jury at the Superior Court of Justice
R. v. T.T.
Client charged with two counts of Sexual Assault, Kidnapping, and Forcible Confinement. It was alleged that he met a girl in Quebec and kidnapped her. While being kidnapped, it was alleged that he forced her to engage in sexual intercourse. Client adamantly denied the allegations and although admitted to having sexual intercourse, he maintained that it was consensual.
Result: Found “not guilty” of all charges by a jury at the Superior Court of Justice
R. v. E.T.
Client charged with two counts of Sexual Assault, two counts of Sexual Interference, Assault with Weapon, and Assault. Client was alleged to have sexually assaulted his step-daughter on numerous occasions. He was also alleged to have used excessive force in disciplining his child
Result: Discharged of all counts after a preliminary hearing.
R. v. G.W.
Client charged with Sexual Assault. It was alleged that after meeting with the complainant at a bar, he offered her a ride home. On the way home, he stopped his vehicle in an empty parking lot and forced her to have sexual intercourse.
Result: Trial before a jury at the Superior Court of Justice; at the end of my cross-examination, the Crown stayed the charge.
R. v. F.F.
Client was charged with Sexual Assault. It was alleged that he held a girl inside his apartment and forced her to have oral sex. Client’s position was that he was not even present and she performed oral sex on another individual.
Result: Found “not guilty” by a jury at the Superior Court of Justice.
R. v. T.C.
Client charged with Gang Sexual Assault and Forcible Confinement. It was alleged that he and others forced a young girl to perform oral sex on them. He denied that he was even present while this was happening and knew nothing about it.
Result: Charge withdrawn during preliminary inquir
